« FOIA request to the Interception of Communications Commissioner regarding the Wilson Doctrine | Main | Adding Public Bodies to Schedule 1 of the Freedom of Information Act - or not »

Interception of Communications Commissioner claims not to be a Public Body under the Freedom of Information Act

We have had a reply from The Assistant Private Secretary to the Interception of Communications Commissioner regarding our Freedom of Information Act request regarding the "Wilson Doctrine" administrative exemption of Members of Parliament to telephone interception.

The letter claims that "your request cannot be acted on". Quelle surprise !

It should be noted that other public bodies which claim not to be such under the FOIA, do try to answer questions from the public, in the spirit of the FOIA e.g. the Association of Chief Police Officers.

Technically the Interception of Communications Commissioner
may not be designated as a Public Body yet, but the office certainly meets both of the conditions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 section 4 Amendment of Schedule 1 to be included in the list of Public Bodies by Order:

2) The first condition is that the body or office- (a) is established by virtue of Her Majesty's prerogative or by an enactment or by subordinate legislation, or

(b) is established in any other way by a Minister of the Crown in his capacity as Minister, by a government department or by the National Assembly for Wales.

(3) The second condition is-

(a) in the case of a body, that the body is wholly or partly constituted by appointment made by the Crown, by a Minister of the Crown, by a government department or by the National Assembly for Wales, or

(b) in the case of an office, that appointments to the office are made by the Crown, by a Minister of the Crown, by a government department or by the National Assembly for Wales.

There can be no question that both of these criteria are clearly fulfilled by Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 section 57 Interception of Communications Commissioner

57. - (1) The Prime Minister shall appoint a Commissioner to be known as the Interception of Communications Commissioner.

We will be writing to the Department for Constitutional Affairs to have all the Commissioners established by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act added to the Schedule 1 list of Public Bodies.

The letter from The Assistant Private Secretary to the Interception of Communications Commissioner:

From: The Assistant Private Secretary to the Interception of Communications Commissioner C/O PO Box 33220, London, SW1H 9ZQ

[Address]

Date 17th January 2005

N.B.Their error with the Date, not ours !

Dear XXX

I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 15th January 2006, forwarded on by the Home Office and received 17th January 2005,

2005 date again !

to the Interception of Communications Commissioner, making a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Under section 1 of the Act a person is entitled to request information from a public authority, Section 3 of theAct defines a "public authority" as any body which , or any person who, or the holder of any office which is-

i) is listed in Schedule 1,or
ii) is designated by order under section 5

The Interception of Communications Commissioner is an individual who holds public office and does not fall under the Act's definition of a public authority. Consequently, your request cannot be acted on.

As you seem to be aware, the Commissioner does produce an ANnual Report, required by virtue of section 58(4) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). These reports are published by the HMSO, and can either be purchased or accessed via the HMSO website.

Surely they mean the Office of Public Sector Information website ?

You can read the latest annual (censored) report online: Annual Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner for 2004 (.pdf)

I also note that you request information that directly relates to RIPA, which should be referred directly to the Home Office as the responsible body for this peice of legislation.

Actually it referred to the "Wilson Doctrine", i.e. the administrative procedures and exemptions to RIPA, the auditing of and the provision of advice about, is the function of the Interception of Communications Commissioner.

I trust that the above response is sufficient for your needs
Yours sincerely

AAA


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.spy.org.uk/cgi-bin/mt331/mt-tb.cgi/1143

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 20, 2006 11:19 AM.

The previous post in this blog was FOIA request to the Interception of Communications Commissioner regarding the Wilson Doctrine.

The next post in this blog is Adding Public Bodies to Schedule 1 of the Freedom of Information Act - or not.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Campaign Button Links

Watching Them, Watching Us, UK Public CCTV Surveillance Regulation Campaign
UK Public CCTV Surveillance Regulation Campaign

NO2ID Campaign - cross party opposition to the NuLabour Compulsory Biometric ID Card
NO2ID Campaign - cross party opposition to the NuLabour Compulsory Biometric ID Card and National Identity Register centralised database.

asboconcern logo
ASBO Concern - is a campaigning alliance of organisations and individuals who are concerned about the abuse of NuLabour's Anti Social Behaviour Orders.

Gary McKinnon is facing extradition to the USA under the controversial 
Extradition Act 2003, without any prima facie evidence or charges brought against him in a UK court. Try him here in the UK, under UK law.
Gary McKinnon is facing extradition to the USA under the controversial Extradition Act 2003, without any prima facie evidence or charges brought against him in a UK court. Try him here in the UK, under UK law.

Peaceful resistance to the curtailment of our rights to Free Assembly and Free Speech in the SOCPA Designated Area around Parliament Square and beyond

Parliament Protest blog - resistance to the Designated Area resticting peaceful demonstrations or lobbying in the vicinity of Parliament.

Petition to the European Commission and European Parliament against their vague Data Retention plans
Data Retention is No Solution Petition to the European Commission and European Parliament against their vague Data Retention plans.

Save Parliament: Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill (and other issues)
Save Parliament - Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill (and other issues)

Open_Rights_Group.png
Open Rights Group

renew for freedom - renew your passport in 2006
Renew For Freedom - renew your Passport in the Summer Autumn of 2006.

Tor - the onion routing network
Tor - the onion routing network - "Tor aims to defend against traffic analysis, a form of network surveillance that threatens personal anonymity and privacy, confidential business activities and relationships, and state security. Communications are bounced around a distributed network of servers called onion routers, protecting you from websites that build profiles of your interests, local eavesdroppers that read your data or learn what sites you visit, and even the onion routers themselves."

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31